<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judges’ Wigs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/2009/06/09/judges%e2%80%99-wigs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/2009/06/09/judges%e2%80%99-wigs/</link>
	<description>12 City Gate, Lower Bridge St, Dublin 8, Ireland. Ph:01 6351580</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:07:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney Rubble Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/2009/06/09/judges%e2%80%99-wigs/comment-page-1/#comment-3827</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney Rubble Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/?p=531#comment-3827</guid>
		<description>erratum &quot;with&quot; should read &quot;wit&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>erratum &#8220;with&#8221; should read &#8220;wit&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barney Rubble Junior</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/2009/06/09/judges%e2%80%99-wigs/comment-page-1/#comment-3826</link>
		<dc:creator>Barney Rubble Junior</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/?p=531#comment-3826</guid>
		<description>Apropos Judges&#039; wigs, I suggest that they
(1) Cover up baldness (male and female)  and bad hair-days (male and female). Judges do have an an independent existence; some are earthy and unbelievably common-sensible and in touch with the common herd. It&#039;s a pity that they are usually retired from office before these attributes come to notice.  And some still have opinions of their attractiveness - consider the trendy long-haired young fellow in previous days who is now a senior judge valiantly striving to appear ancient and sagacious- but we remember the &quot;Bishop Cumiskey look- (apologies to Bishop C but it s the only comparable example now that the late lamented Judge O&#039;Leary has departed to a Higher Bench; seated just Left of the Right Hand...).

Also, wigs preserve Judges&#039; learned scalps from excessive scratching when befuddled by   the equally learned but completely divergent and opposing interpretations of the same laws studied ad infinitum by the best and brightest in the  business. 

I new an old and delightful District Judge who wore his wig as a badge of elitism and only brightened up and was effusively welcoming when a brother-in-wig appeared in his court; Barristers stick together when faced by the common herd of un-bewigged legal sparrows!

Finally, I heard an old man once remarking that the judiciary wore wigs to protect their learned heads from the cudgels of dissatisfied litigants. I of course was duty-bound to correct him (he had heard about  too many faction-fights from his grand-father&#039;s grandfather)in stating that those elevated to the upper benches - whether by political &#039;leg-up or over&#039; or strictly on the merits - were obliged to meet the conditions precedent for elevation by  having a hard (impenetrable) head and a neck like Dunlop&#039;s steel ball-bearings.

Did you notice how much like your friendly, jovial Father O&#039;Flynn type of local Parish Priest, Ex-Mr Justice Barrington looked recently on T.V. Here was a man of the people; a man you could warm to! Never having met him in the Bar Library, or even at the Bar or in any bar, I feel that not a little of his obvious charm and great with is due to the act that discarded the wig and exposed his human head.

I say and demand that only females be allowed to wear  wigs nowadays- whether on the Bench or on the tiles! 

Barney</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apropos Judges&#8217; wigs, I suggest that they<br />
(1) Cover up baldness (male and female)  and bad hair-days (male and female). Judges do have an an independent existence; some are earthy and unbelievably common-sensible and in touch with the common herd. It&#8217;s a pity that they are usually retired from office before these attributes come to notice.  And some still have opinions of their attractiveness &#8211; consider the trendy long-haired young fellow in previous days who is now a senior judge valiantly striving to appear ancient and sagacious- but we remember the &#8220;Bishop Cumiskey look- (apologies to Bishop C but it s the only comparable example now that the late lamented Judge O&#8217;Leary has departed to a Higher Bench; seated just Left of the Right Hand&#8230;).</p>
<p>Also, wigs preserve Judges&#8217; learned scalps from excessive scratching when befuddled by   the equally learned but completely divergent and opposing interpretations of the same laws studied ad infinitum by the best and brightest in the  business. </p>
<p>I new an old and delightful District Judge who wore his wig as a badge of elitism and only brightened up and was effusively welcoming when a brother-in-wig appeared in his court; Barristers stick together when faced by the common herd of un-bewigged legal sparrows!</p>
<p>Finally, I heard an old man once remarking that the judiciary wore wigs to protect their learned heads from the cudgels of dissatisfied litigants. I of course was duty-bound to correct him (he had heard about  too many faction-fights from his grand-father&#8217;s grandfather)in stating that those elevated to the upper benches &#8211; whether by political &#8216;leg-up or over&#8217; or strictly on the merits &#8211; were obliged to meet the conditions precedent for elevation by  having a hard (impenetrable) head and a neck like Dunlop&#8217;s steel ball-bearings.</p>
<p>Did you notice how much like your friendly, jovial Father O&#8217;Flynn type of local Parish Priest, Ex-Mr Justice Barrington looked recently on T.V. Here was a man of the people; a man you could warm to! Never having met him in the Bar Library, or even at the Bar or in any bar, I feel that not a little of his obvious charm and great with is due to the act that discarded the wig and exposed his human head.</p>
<p>I say and demand that only females be allowed to wear  wigs nowadays- whether on the Bench or on the tiles! </p>
<p>Barney</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daragh O Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/2009/06/09/judges%e2%80%99-wigs/comment-page-1/#comment-3786</link>
		<dc:creator>Daragh O Brien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mcgarrsolicitors.ie/?p=531#comment-3786</guid>
		<description>So, the Pope speaks &quot;ex cathedra&quot; when expounding infallibly. Does the importance of the judges&#039; wigs mean that they speak &quot;ex saeta&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, the Pope speaks &#8220;ex cathedra&#8221; when expounding infallibly. Does the importance of the judges&#8217; wigs mean that they speak &#8220;ex saeta&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

