Digital Rights case (continued)

THE HIGH COURT
2006 No. 3785P

 

Between

 

DIGITAL RIGHTS IRELAND LIMITED

Plaintiff

And

 

THE MINISTER FOR COMMUNICATIONS, MARINE AND NATURAL RESOURCES, THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE, EQUALITY AND LAW REFORM, THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE GARDA SIOCHANA, IRELAND AND THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Defendants

UPDATE (7/7/2008)

1. Three Motions are (or were) before the High Court. One, that of the Irish Human Rights Commission, was promptly decided by the judge in favour of the IHRC. The IHRC is now a “party” to the proceedings as “amicus curiae”.

2. The State challenged the locus standi of the Plaintiff to brings its proceedings. The IHRC has supported the right of the Plaintiff to bring its proceedings. The Defendants are denying that right but have made concessions in the hearings.

3. The State claims that the Plaintiff should furnish security for costs.

4. The Plaintiff’s current application is for a reference by the High Court to the European Court of Justice for a ruling from the ECJ on the validity of Directive 2006/24/EC.

5. The hearing of the Motions has continued before Judge McKechnie in the High Court and is now adjourned to 11th July 2008 at 10.30 am.

Discussion

No comments for “Digital Rights case (continued)”

Post a comment

Recent Posts

Making the SOPA Sausages
January 28, 2012
Simon McGarr
Message from Minister Sean Sherlock to All TDs and Senators
January 25, 2012
Simon McGarr
Stop SOPA Ireland: We must have Openness, not murky backroom deals
January 25, 2012
Simon McGarr
More about the Injuries Board
January 16, 2012
Edward McGarr
The Injuries Board – some Questions and Answers
January 5, 2012
Edward McGarr

Need Legal Advice?

Send your details to McGarr Solicitors and we'll be happy to contact you.

Your Name (required):

Your Email (required):

Your Telephone:

Your Message:

 

July 2008
M T W T F S S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Friend us on Facebook

Bad Behavior has blocked 892 access attempts in the last 7 days.